No Human is Illegal: The Rights of Immigrants

No Human is Illegal: The Rights of Immigrants


People are migrating for several different reasons. Perhaps it’s because they need to be reunited with their families, to hunt for much better economic opportunities or to escape from any human rights abuses including the persecution, torture, and armed conflict, regardless of what and which reasons are, it’s their rights to make a decision and choose an area they need to measure. 

Basically, migrants are entitled to possess equivalent human rights protections as all individuals, although it varies counting on the policies and ground rules of a state.

For example, it’s going to limit migrants’ rights in some ways, like with reference to voting and political participation. Recently, there are an estimated number of 258 million people and approximately three percent of the world’s population are currently living outside their country of origin. Many of whose migration is characterised by varying degrees of coercion. 

Albeit that a lot of migrants has chosen to go away their countries of origin annually, there also are issues reported that an increasing number of migrants are forced to go away their homes for a posh combination of reasons, these include poverty, education, lack of access to healthcare, water, housing, food, and therefore the consequences of environmental degradation and global climate change, also because of the more ‘traditional’ drivers of forced displacement like persecution and conflict. 

Numerous human rights treaties are stated so as to explicitly prohibit discrimination on the idea of national origin of and required the States to make sure that migrants’ human rights are equally and fairly protected. The protections afforded to a migrant like access to their Social Security also will depend upon which treaties a State has ratified.

Migrants whose rights are all protected are ready to sleep in dignity and security. In return, they will be ready to contribute better to society in terms of economical and social aspects instead of those that are exploited, excluded, and marginalized. 

In spite of the very fact that each one migrant are often susceptible to human rights violations, those that are in an irregular situation are often particularly vulnerable to the discriminations, exploitations, exclusions, and abuse in the least stages of the migration process. 

Additionally, like other specific vulnerable groups, migrants are given special protections under the law of countries, so as to affect situations where their rights are most in peril, like within transit, in detention, or within the workplace. 

In 2010, the GMG or also referred to as Global Migration Group expressed its deep concern regarding things of the particularly vulnerable group of migrants, noting that the irregular situation during which international migrants may find themselves shouldn’t be deprived them either of their humanity or of their human rights. Human rights norms and standards are often powerful programmatic and methodological tools for action. 

Accordingly, core international human rights instruments constitute a framework of action also as a gaggle of guidelines for migration policy-makers. 

There is a spread of fantastic practice examples in several regions of the earth on how national and native governments can fulfill their obligations under human rights law, like decriminalizing irregular migration, or ensuring that the functions of public service providers like nurses or teachers are kept strictly to interrupt away those of the immigration authorities. 

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights begins with a recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family. Human rights law thus provides that generally, all persons, without discrimination, must have access to all or any or any fundamental human rights with narrow limitations related to political rights and freedom of movement.

States are further obliged to make sure that any differential treatment, between citizens and non-citizens or among different groups of non-citizens, is undertaken during a non-discriminatory manner, that is, for a legitimate objective, which the course of action taken to realize this objective is proportionate and reasonable. 

Human rights approach to migration places the migrant at the center of migration policies and management and pays particular attention to the disadvantaged groups of migrants. 

Moreover, such an approach will confirm that migrants are included in relevant national action plans and methods in the states, for example, the plans on the availability of housing projects or national strategies in order to combat racism and xenophobia. 

Views on race among America’s white majority shaped policies around both immigration and civil rights shifted in the 20th century.  It was inspired partially by eugenicist theories of inferior and superior races groups. The tough Immigration Act of 1924 in which implemented a quota system for countries within the orient, effectively banning immigration from China, Korea, and therefore the Philippines and severely limiting the flow of migrants from southern and eastern Europe. As an example, between the year 1900 and 1910,  an estimated number of 200,000 Italian immigrants arrived annually within the United States.

After the year of 1924, a law went into effect, and that number dropped to around 4,000. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which replaced the quotas with a system of preferences that favored beloved migration, was a neighborhood of a series of sweeping laws including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and therefore the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that sought to realign the United States policies to change views on the rights of minorities.

Today, lawful permanent residents of the U.S. have the proper to return to the U.S. after travelling abroad, and should surely qualify for state benefits. a person within the U.S., whatever their status, is allowed to bring claims in U.S. courts. 

The Office of the diplomat for Human Rights promotes a person’s rights-based approach to migration, which places the migrant at the middle of migration policies and governance, and seeks to make sure that migrants are included altogether to relevant national action plans and methods. Just like plans on the availability of housing projects or national strategies to combat racism and xenophobia. 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *